<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>oil on Solar Noon</title>
    <link>https://solarnoon.net/categories/oil/</link>
    <description></description>
    
    <language>en</language>
    
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 11:03:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
    
    <item>
      <title>Polling shows anti-clean-energy BS is working</title>
      <link>https://solarnoon.net/2026/04/06/sobering-opinion-numbers-from-the.html</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 11:03:30 -0500</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://solarnoon.micro.blog/2026/04/06/sobering-opinion-numbers-from-the.html</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Sobering opinion numbers from the Pew Research Center on &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2026/04/03/americans-shifting-views-on-energy-issues/&#34;&gt;&amp;ldquo;Americans’ Shifting Views on Energy Issues&amp;rdquo;&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The share of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents who say the country should prioritize oil, coal and natural gas over wind and solar power has doubled to 71% over the last six years.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I won&amp;rsquo;t quote extensively; the gist is that respondents generally have shifted away from preferring clean &amp;amp; renewable energy, and toward fossil fuels. This is especially pronounced among Republicans. You can click through if you want to see the rather depressing numbers and charts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They word all of this very passively, which may be the impartial style that suits an opinion research organization. But presuming that&amp;rsquo;s the case, they shouldn&amp;rsquo;t title a section of this article, &amp;ldquo;Why are views changing on wind and solar energy?&amp;rdquo;, because they do not even try to answer that question. The answer is very simple: the billionaire class generally, including companies as well as individuals, and the Republican party specifically, have long waged a very concentrated and very well-funded campaign of lies to achieve these very results.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Because – pardon my language – how the &lt;em&gt;fuck&lt;/em&gt; could any sensible person, let alone 20% of &amp;ldquo;Republican/Lean Republican&amp;rdquo; people, think that solar is &amp;ldquo;worse&amp;rdquo; for the environment?! (The 4% of &amp;ldquo;Dem/Lean Dem&amp;rdquo; in the same category are equally mystifying, but that number is almost low enough to just chalk up to the uninformed and the fools.) I mean, really. &lt;em&gt;Worse!&lt;/em&gt; How??&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&amp;rsquo;s so tragically comical that I won&amp;rsquo;t even interrogate it on the merits. There are no merits! This is like a doctor telling an unhealthy, pre-diabetic person with obesity that they should switch from drinking a gallon of soda a day to drinking a gallon of water, and then their crazy (red-pilled, Fox-news-addled, MAGA) buddy convincing them that that would be &lt;em&gt;worse&lt;/em&gt; for them. It&amp;rsquo;s just pure nonsense.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When getting into specific projects, there can be issues to figure out. Land-use by large solar and wind farms, who pays for what and who benefits (i.e., keeping for-profit utilities from ripping off consumers), and so on. But in the big picture, as portrayed by this survey and the people being asked broad questions like &amp;ldquo;Is solar good or bad?&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;Is coal good or bad?&amp;rdquo;, anti-clean-energy propaganda is just that. It&amp;rsquo;s craven, self-serving, for-profit bullshit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is the fight: to educate those who need it, and to un-misinform those who have been fed these lies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;rsquo;s your cheat-sheet if you ever get included in a survey like this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Production of wind and solar power: &lt;strong&gt;encourage&lt;/strong&gt; 👍&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Use of electric vehicles: &lt;strong&gt;encourage&lt;/strong&gt; 👍&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Production of nuclear power: &lt;strong&gt;discourage&lt;/strong&gt; 👎&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Oil and gas drilling: &lt;strong&gt;discourage&lt;/strong&gt; 👎&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Coal mining: &lt;strong&gt;discourage&lt;/strong&gt; 👎&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>